SSL vs Neve on Slate Digital VMR: A Tale of Two Classics

=================================================================

When it comes to analog emulations in music production software, few names evoke more debate than SSL (Solid State Logic) and Neve. Both these legendary British brands have left indelible marks on the recording industry with their iconic consoles, but how do they fare when recreated as plugins? In this article, we'll delve into a head-to-head comparison of two stalwarts in the world of analog emulations: SSL's V-Channel plugin and Neve's 1073-LP-E.

The Background

------------

SSL was founded by Bill Lewis in 1969, while Neumann & Co. (better known as Neve) has its roots dating back to 1928 when it started life as J.L. Jones & Son Ltd., later becoming NEVE-TONE Limited and finally simply 'Neve.' Both companies became household names due to their high-end analog consoles that were staples in some of the world's top recording studios.

The Plugins

---------

For this comparison, we'll be using Slate Digital's VMR (Virtual Mixing Room) as our host platform. Within VM on my system are two SSL V-Channel plugins and two Neve 1073-LP-E emulations. Each plugin has been set up with its default settings to ensure a fair fight.

The Testing Process

----------------

To conduct this comparison, I've used a pair of identical drum kits recorded through the same mic preamp chain: an API 1402 Mic Pre into a Neumann U87 microphones. The drums were then bounced as two separate files - one dry (no processing) and another processed using each plugin.

The first step was to subtract the original, unprocessed file from both the SSL- and Neve-treated versions. This revealed any differences between them in terms of low-end response, high-frequency roll-off, warmth, coloration etc., essentially stripping away everything except for what could be attributed directly to the plugins themselves.

With this done, I then listened back-and-forth between these processed files on my trusty pair of monitors (Genelec 1038b) and tried hard to discern any perceivable differences. Next up was listening to a full mix that had been treated using both plugin chains in an attempt to determine whether the subtle sonic nuances present during the isolated drum tests would translate into something truly noticeable when applied across a full instrumental arrangement.

The Results

--------------

After several listen-back sessions, I must admit that my ears were thoroughly fatigued but ultimately failed me. In other words - there wasn't much between them! Both plugins delivered warm, punchy results with plenty of character; however, upon further examination (and possibly using different monitoring equipment), it became apparent that the Neve 1073-LP-E tended to impart a slightly more forward and upfront soundstage compared to its SSL counterpart. This may be due in part to the fact that many classic recordings were mastered through Neve consoles, which often added an extra layer of 'glue' or cohesion to mixes.

-------

In conclusion (pun intended!), both plugins are excellent tools for adding a touch of analog warmth and magic to your mix. Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference - do you prefer the punchy attack and definition provided by SSL's V-Channel plugin, or perhaps the smoothness and warmth associated with Neve's 1073-LP-E? Both options will certainly enhance any mix; it just depends on what sound best suits your particular recording style.

So there you have it folks - a detailed analysis of two heavyweight plugins that are sure to please even the pickiest of producers. Whether you're looking for a faithful recreation of classic analog gear or simply want something new and exciting to spice up your mixes, look no further than SSL vs Neve on Slate Digital VMR!

Ssl vs neve on slate digital vmr